Return to Litigation Matrix
                   Credit:

Pleadings
Depositions
Hearings
Document Productions
Case law, decisions
    
Press Release re: Tribe's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment  08/24/00


back to  case matrix

Miccosukee 
v. United States National Park Service


U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

98-521-CIV-NESBITT

  
 

Litigation Summary

Court Proceedings in Federal Court United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

 

Style  

 

Case No 98-521-CIV-NISBETT 

 

Comments This past spring (1999) the Miccosukee Tribe filed a lawsuit against the United
States government, the National Park Service and Wally Hibbard in his
official capacity as Superintendent of Big Cypress National Preserve.

1. On October 11, 1974, Congress Established the Big Cypress National
Preserve 16 USC 698 f-m.

2. Section 698j of the Act provides: "Notwithstanding this section or any
other provisions of sections 698f to 698m of this title, members of the
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida.....shall be permitted, subject to
reasonable regulations established by the Secretary, to continue their usual
and customary use and occupancy of federal or federally acquired lands and
waters within the preserve, including hunting, fishing, and trapping on a
subsistence basis and traditional Tribal ceremonials."

3. Section 698k of the Act further provides: "Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, before entering into any contract for the provision of
revenue producing visitor services, (i) the Secretary shall offer those
members of the Miccosukee....who, on January 1, 1972, were engaged in the
provision of similar services, a right of first refusal to continue providing
such services within the preserve subject to such terms and conditions as he

may deem appropriate, and (ii) before entering into any contract or agreement
to provide new revenue-producing visitor services within the preserve, the
Secretary shall offer to the Miccosukee tribe of Indians of Florida....the
right of first refusal to provide such services, the right to open for a
period of ninety days.... No such agreement may be signed or otherwise
transferred without the consent of the Secretary."

The lawsuit alleged the following:

1. BCNP improperly granted an airboat concession in the preserve (commercial
use licenses).

2. BCNP failed to comply with regulations which govern bidding procedures
for the airboat concession.

3. BCNP failed to conduct an environmental impact analysis pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 USC 4321 and
implementing regulations.

4. BCNP violated the Miccosukee Tribe's right of first refusal.
Status  

 

 

 

 

Return to top of page

Credit:

Everglades photograph courtesy Philip Greenspun

 

   02/28/04

University of Miami School of Law Library
Archives and Special Collections
1311 Miller Drive
Law Library, Room 489
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
Telephone: 284-4093
Copyright, 1999 University of Miami. All Rights Reserved.
Requests for information.
Send comments/technical feedback.