1
1 DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA
2
CASE NOS. 92-3038
3 92-3039
92-3040
4
SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF )
5 FLORIDA, et. al., )
)
6 Petitioners, )
)
7 vs. )
)
8 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT )
DISTRICT, )
9 )
Respondent. )
10 )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et. al.,)
11 )
Intervenors )
12
13
14 99 Northeast 4th Street
Miami, Florida
15 March 3, 1992
9:20 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
16
17
18
19 Deposition of Doctor Courtney T. Hackney
20
21 Taken before Stan Seplin, Certified Shorthand
22 Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of
23 Florida at Large, pursuant to Notice of Taking
24 Deposition filed in the above cause.
25 - - - - - - -
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
2
1 APPEARANCES:
2
3
ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS:
4
Earl, Blank, Kavanaugh & Stotts, P.A.
5 Two South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3636
Miami, Florida 33131
6 BY: William L. Hyde, Esq.
7 ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES:
8 United States Department of Justice
Environmental and Natural Resources Division
9 Post Office Box 663
Washington, D.C. 20044-0663
10 BY: Stephen G. Bartell, AUSA
11 ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS:
12 Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman, LTD.
100 Southeast 2nd Street, Suite 4000
13 Miami, Florida 33131
BY: Paul L. Nettleton, Esq.
14
ALSO PRESENT: Mark D. Maffei, Ph.D.
15
- - - - - - -
16
I N D E X
17
WITNESS DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS
18 Dr. C.T. Hackney 3 --
19 GOVERNMENT'S EXHIBITS
Hackney One - Page 111
20 Hackney Two - Page 113
Hackney Three - Page 175
21 Hackney Four - Page 208
Hackney Five - Page 212
22 Hackney Six and Seven - Page 218
Hackney Eight - Page 244
23
24
25
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
4
1 Thereupon:
2 Doctor Courtney T. Hackney,
3 was called as a witness by the United States, and
4 after being first duly sworn, was examined and
5 testified under oath as follows:
6 DIRECT EXAMINATION
7 BY MR. BARTELL:
8 Q. Good morning. My name is Steven Bartell
9 with the Department of Justice.
10 I'm representing the United States in
11 litigation ongoing over the regulatory program, or
12 SWIM Plan which has been proposed by the South
13 Florida Water Management District.
14 Could you please state your name, for
15 the record.
16 A. Courtney Thomas Hackney.
17 Q. Doctor Hackney, I'm going to be asking
18 you a number of questions. If you don't understand
19 any of my questions, or if anything is unclear, I
20 would ask you to please tell me, or give me the
21 opportunity to rephrase. This will insure you're
22 answering the questions I'm asking.
23 If you've answered the questions, I'm
24 going to assume that you understood the questions
25 I've asked.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
5
1 Is that agreeable?
2 A. Certainly.
3 Q. Also, at any time if you wish to take a
4 break, please let me know, and we can break for a
5 few minutes, or what have you.
6 A. Okay.
7 Q. Have you ever been deposed before?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Can you give me-- tell me when that was?
10 A. It was multiple times.
11 I have been deposed a number of times.
12 Q. Can you tell me approximately how many
13 times?
14 A. I would say, maybe six or less.
15 Q. Could we try to walk through these past
16 depositions and the context in which they were
17 taken, and approximately the dates, to the best of
18 your recollection?
19 A. It will be to the best of my
20 recollection, yes.
21 Q. Let me ask you, have any of those
22 depositions been associated with the case that
23 you're currently-- that you're here on today?
24 A. No.
25 Q. When was the last time you were deposed?
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
6
1 A. Between two and four years ago.
2 Q. And can you tell me what that was
3 regarding?
4 A. It was regarding the Concord Naval
5 facility out in California near San Francisco Bay.
6 Q. Were you an expert in that proceeding?
7 Obviously there must have been a court
8 proceeding?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. Were you a hired expert in that case?
11 A. Yes, and I may have this wrong, so--
12 since I don't remember exactly what my role was
13 totally.
14 I did research for the U.S. Army Corps
15 of Engineers, which related to the case, and I was
16 deposed on matters related to my data, and as I
17 recall, on the case in general.
18 Q. What kind of research did you do for the
19 Corps?
20 A. I did work on the benthic invertebrates,
21 and a marsh adjacent to Suisun Bay, which is the
22 subject of the--
23 Q. Did you say benthic invertebrates?
24 A. Yes, the benthic-- the animals living on
25 the tidal marshes.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
7
1 Q. Where was the bay?
2 A. Suisun Bay is a sub-bay of the San
3 Francisco bay system.
4 Q. What conclusion did you reach regarding
5 that past research?
6 A. I don't remember.
7 Q. The-- you mentioned you were deposed a
8 number of times.
9 Can you tell me the time prior to that,
10 that you were deposed, to the best of your
11 recollection?
12 A. I think I'm forgetting one in between.
13 I was deposed on a case in which the EPA
14 was contending that a-- an old landfill was
15 contaminating a large area of tidal swamp and tidal
16 marsh, and I had performed some research to verify
17 some of the hypotheses that the EPA had proposed.
18 Q. Where was that located?
19 A. Near Wilmington, North Carolina.
20 Q. Did you reach conclusions in that case?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. Do you recall what those conclusions
23 were?
24 A. The conclusion was that the hypothesis
25 that was advanced by the EPA, was invalid.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
8
1 Q. Was invalid?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. Who were you hired by in that case?
4 A. I was working with-- I think it was the
5 City of Wilmington.
6 There were multiple defendants in that
7 case, including the City of Wilmington, New Hanover
8 County, etcetera, but I think I was working for the
9 City of Wilmington, if I recall.
10 Q. Was this a case against the Federal
11 Government or the EPA?
12 A. This was a case that the EPA had
13 brought, contending that there were a number of
14 damages caused by the landfill.
15 Q. Back up to the deposition prior to this
16 case in North Carolina.
17 Do you recall what was the next one,
18 going in reverse chronological order?
19 A. Not the most recent one-- you mean the
20 one prior to that?
21 Q. Yes.
22 A. (No response.)
23 Q. If you don't know them exactly in the
24 right order, that's not necessarily--
25 A. There was a case in which there was a
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
9
1 marsh filling under Section 404. I think that's the
2 authority which it was brought, in which the Corps
3 of Engineers was attempting to have the land filled,
4 basically.
5 Q. Were you hired by the Corps in that
6 case?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. And did you reach conclusions in that
9 case?
10 A. Yes, I think I-- yes, I did.
11 Q. All right.
12 A. My role in that case was an expert
13 witness on the types of wetlands that were
14 involved.
15 I did not give testimony as to factual
16 data. I did not collect my data, myself.
17 Q. Approximately what time period was that?
18 A. '85, maybe, '84.
19 Q. The previous deposition you mentioned,
20 the land fill contamination--
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. Approximately what years were those--
23 was that?
24 A. Right in that same time frame.
25 I'm sorry I can't give you better dates.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
10
1 I rely on my notes at home.
2 Q. That's fine. Just going back before
3 that, the case where you were hired by the Corps,
4 regarding the bay in California--
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. That was about two to four years ago,
7 approximately?
8 A. No. That case started, I think, in
9 1982.
10 And that proceeded, as some of these
11 cases do, for a long period of time.
12 I was not deposed until some time, maybe
13 in the last four years. I can't give you an exact
14 date, but I would say in the last four years.
15 Q. Okay. Can you think of some other
16 situations or cases where you have been deposed?
17 A. I think I was deposed in a case
18 involving First Colony Farms.
19 Q. What is First Colony Farms?
20 A. It was a proposed large peat farming
21 operation, in which I was retained by the Corps of
22 Engineers to design a research plan to accomplish
23 the direction given to them by the-- by, I think it
24 was, a federal judge.
25 That was, again, in response to-- I'm
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
11
1 not a hundred percent certain, but in response to
2 what I think was a challenge by the EPA, I think, or
3 private groups.
4 I can't remember whether I was actually
5 deposed in that case or not.
6 Q. Did you say you were hired by the Corps?
7 A. By the Corps of Engineers.
8 Q. Do you recall if you reached conclusions
9 in that case?
10 A. Yes. I remember the conclusions pretty
11 clearly, because I wrote a report for the Corps of
12 Engineers on that, and my conclusion was in that
13 particular case, the hydrologic function of the
14 wetland had been clearly removed from a portion of
15 the property, and I think that was the current
16 contention.
17 Q. Do you consider yourself an expert in
18 wetlands?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. What type of wetland was this, with
21 First Colony Farms?
22 A. First Colony Farms, what is classified
23 as a pocosin, p-o-c-o-s-i-n, in many of the old
24 systems.
25 It's basically a shrub bog, in the more
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
12
1 modern classification schemes, with large peat
2 application.
3 Q. Would you characterize the Everglades,
4 as a pocosin wetland?
5 A. No.
6 Q. What were the approximate dates of this
7 First Colony Farms case?
8 A. Some time in the 80's.
9 It all blends together after a number of
10 years.
11 Q. Can you think of any other examples,
12 where you have had your deposition taken?
13 A. No, but I think there's one more that
14 I'm forgetting, and maybe I'll recall it before this
15 is over.
16 Q. If you do recall it, would you bring
17 that to my attention?
18 A. I will.
19 Q. Okay, so what-- my understanding is that
20 we have approximately four-- fully four times that
21 you've been deposed, that you can recall previously
22 at this time, and-- were these all lawsuits where
23 you were deposed?
24 A. I think they were all legal actions of
25 some sort.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
13
1 Q. Did you testify in either a judicial or
2 administrative type of hearing, in any of those
3 cases?
4 A. Yes. I know in one of them, I remember
5 testifying in court, and that was a federal judge in
6 that case.
7 Q. Which case was that?
8 A. That was the case of-- that I mentioned
9 in North Carolina, in which there was a 404
10 violation.
11 And I know I testified in some
12 administrative hearings before, and in one case,
13 which I did not give a deposition, I testified as
14 to-- as to whether the-- a particular piece of
15 property was a primary nursery ground for fishes and
16 shrimps and crabs, and that sort of thing.
17 Q. Do you recall any other details about
18 that case?
19 For instance, do you recall who you were
20 hired by?
21 A. I was hired by a landowner.
22 They were questioning the designation of
23 a portion of this property that they put a nursery
24 on, and I don't recall giving a deposition in that
25 case.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
14
1 I think I provided a report. I don't
2 remember a deposition.
3 Q. So you've mentioned twice that you can
4 recall, that you've testified; once in federal court
5 and once in an administrative hearing.
6 Do you recall any other times that you
7 have testified?
8 A. Yes, I do.
9 I testified in 1976 or '77, and I
10 believe this was a hearing involving permits for a
11 Dupont facility.
12 Q. Was that Dupont?
13 A. Dupont.
14 That was in Mississippi, on St. Louis
15 Bay, as a matter of fact.
16 Q. What was the subject of your testimony?
17 A. I think most of what I was providing at
18 that hearing was a background as to what wetlands in
19 that bay-- how they worked, what fauna and flora
20 were, that sort of thing.
21 Q. So you didn't actually do sampling
22 necessarily, but you were just testifying as to the
23 natural environment?
24 A. Well, I had worked in that system for--
25 from 1974 through 1981, basically, so before that
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
15
1 hearing, I had done quite a bit of work there, so
2 while I wasn't testifying, per se, about anything
3 the plant had done, because it had not been built, I
4 was basically giving testimony as to what I
5 anticipated occurring, given certain parameters.
6 Q. Do you know if the plant was ultimately
7 built?
8 A. Yes, it was.
9 Q. Did your expectations come to pass?
10 A. I really don't know.
11 I have not conducted any research there
12 since they built it.
13 Plus many of my concerns were addressed
14 in the final permit, so I think they limited the
15 environmental impact by what they did with the
16 permit.
17 Q. Do you recall any other examples where
18 you have testified, either in administrative forums
19 or in court?
20 You mentioned three so far.
21 A. That's all I remember.
22 Again, if they pop into my mind, I'll
23 let you know.
24 Q. I appreciate that.
25 Do you have copies of the transcripts of
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
16
1 any of those prior proceedings where you testified?
2 A. No.
3 Q. Backing up, could you state what your
4 current address is?
5 A. Professional or private?
6 Q. Let's start with professional.
7 A. The Department of Biological Sciences,
8 University of North Carolina at Wilmington,
9 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405.
10 Q. And your personal?
11 A. 7007 Northbend, one word, Road,
12 Wilmington, North Carolina 28505.
13 Q. Could you describe to me what your
14 current employment is?
15 A. I'm professor of biological sciences.
16 My primary responsibilities are teaching
17 ecology, wetland biology and estuarine biology.
18 Q. What's the third one?
19 A. I said estuarine, e-s-t-u-a-r-i-n-e.
20 Coastal biology is a good analogy for
21 that.
22 Q. Other than when you are teaching or you
23 are a professor-- well, let me rephrase that.
24 What percentage of your time is spent
25 acting as a professor or teaching?
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
17
1 A. I--
2 Q. Approximately.
3 A. My designated time for teaching is 100
4 percent, basically. That's considered at my
5 university, 12 contact hours.
6 Q. 12 what?
7 A. Contact hours. 12 contact hours.
8 As part of my job, I also do research
9 and direct graduate students, and serve on state and
10 local commissions, and whatever else, for public
11 service.
12 Q. And I guess in addition to that, you are
13 able to serve as an expert in other proceedings?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. You mentioned before that you considered
16 yourself an expert in wetlands.
17 We're going to be looking through your
18 CV and your past work, and degrees.
19 That reflects where the basis upon which
20 you can safely feel you're an expert in wetlands?
21 A. Yes, in total.
22 Q. Okay. I know that you mentioned you
23 spend approximately 100 percent of your time
24 teaching, in addition to these numerous other
25 activities.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
18
1 Approximately what percentage of your
2 time is spent currently, or, let's say, within the
3 last couple of years, acting as an expert or
4 offering your opinions in proceedings?
5 A. You would have to break that down into
6 different time frames.
7 From August of '92 through June of '93,
8 I was not at the university.
9 At that time, I worked for Breedlove,
10 Dennis & Associates as a senior wetland scientist,
11 and head of the wetland section.
12 Q. Let's go to the time period following
13 that.
14 A. Okay. Since that time, I guess during
15 the summer, I guess I would be considered a hundred
16 percent consulting.
17 Q. That's the summer of '93?
18 A. Summer of '93.
19 Q. What was that hundred percent consulting
20 regarding?
21 A. Well, some of it involved this case.
22 It involved a permitting project in
23 Southern Louisiana wetlands, for Kaiser Aluminum.
24 It involved working with NOAA on
25 projects dealing with wetland restoration. In this
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
19
1 case, it was a bay in Massachusetts, which
2 apparently is one of the worst polluted sites up
3 there.
4 I can't think of the name right now.
5 It involved a project dealing with
6 permitting, and a marina in North Carolina.
7 It also involved the development of
8 wetland functional index for the U.S. Army Corps of
9 Engineers, and that is a method by which field
10 personnel will be able to evaluate the functional
11 importance or significance of various wetlands
12 anywhere in the country.
13 Q. What do you mean, importance?
14 Did you say functional importance?
15 A. It is-- I lead the-- one section. There
16 are four-- three different groups that the Corps has
17 commissioned and funded to develop methodology for
18 basically allowing a field person from the Corps or
19 any other agency, to go to a site, and very rapidly
20 assess how valuable that is for ecological functions
21 in a quantitative manner, so a ten, for instance,
22 might be a very high quality for a fishery, and a
23 zero might be no value from that function.
24 It's a long, ongoing project, and this
25 summer, they gave increased funding for it, so I was
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
20
1 working on that, as well.
2 Q. Is that index complete or finished?
3 A. No.
4 Q. Is that an ongoing process, or will it
5 be completed at some point?
6 A. It's an ongoing project.
7 The completion date is dependent upon
8 how soon and when the Corps can provide funding.
9 Q. All right. You mentioned approximately
10 five different activities or cases pending, that you
11 were working over the summer of '93.
12 After the summer of '93, up until today,
13 what-- approximately what percentage of your time is
14 spent consulting?
15 A. Less than ten percent.
16 Q. All right.
17 A. And it would depend on how you would
18 decide to apportion that.
19 Much of the consulting that I do during
20 the summer, typically involves weekend work, that
21 sort of thing.
22 That I can do, as much hours as I have,
23 and during a semester and during school time, it's
24 pretty limited.
25 Q. When did you first get involved in this
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
21
1 case?
2 A. August of '93.
3 Q. And these other cases that you mentioned
4 you worked on over the summer, summer of '93--
5 Kaiser Aluminum, working with NOAA, permitting a
6 marina and this functional index, are any of those
7 legal proceedings?
8 A. Not to my knowledge.
9 MR. NETTLETON: Off the record.
10 (Discussion off the record.)
11 BY MR. BARTELL:
12 Q. Doctor, you just previously mentioned
13 that you started working on this case, August of
14 '93.
15 Did you mean to say August of 1992?
16 A. Correct.
17 Q. Going to when you were first involved
18 with the case-- who were you first contacted by?
19 A. Can you restate that?
20 Q. Sure. Who first initiated contact with
21 you which led to your involvement in this case?
22 A. In terms of the case, the legal
23 proceedings--
24 Q. Yes.
25 A. The-- I'm not sure when I talked with
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
22
1 anyone about the legal side of this.
2 Probably as soon as I started at BDA, I
3 was asked to design some methodologies to get at
4 some answers that were pending in the case,
5 technical answers.
6 If you're asking about when I first
7 started working in the Everglades doing research,
8 then it would be August of 1992.
9 If you're asking when I first got
10 involved with the legal part of this, in terms of
11 these sorts of proceedings, it would be after that,
12 and I'm not sure what that date was.
13 Q. So it would-- you were head of the
14 wetland section at BDA?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. You mentioned from August of '92 through
17 June of '93.
18 A. Correct.
19 Q. It was during that time period you were
20 first acquainted with the Everglades or the current
21 situation that's facing the Everglades?
22 A. I was acquainted with the Everglades
23 before then. I grew up in South Florida.
24 It was the first time that I had gotten
25 involved in any research that pertained to this
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
23
1 litigation.
2 Q. And who was BDA working for?
3 A. Let's see. Peeples, Earl, Kavanaugh,
4 Stotts--
5 MR. NETTLETON: You left out somebody
6 else.
7 THE WITNESS: I don't know. It's--
8 MR. HYDE: Peeples, Earl & Blank at the
9 time.
10 BY MR. BARTELL:
11 Q. So BDA was working for, for lack of-- or
12 for ease of discussion it-- let's say the Peeples'
13 law firm, Peeples, Earl & Blank?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. BDA was working for them, and you were
16 working for BDA?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. What were you doing for them?
19 I understand that you were head of the
20 wetland section, but more specifically, what were
21 you doing for them?
22 A. Do you want a breakdown of my
23 responsibilities?
24 Q. Yes.
25 A. Okay. Part of my responsibility was
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
24
1 administrative, administering, handling personnel,
2 etcetera, evaluations of people.
3 Part of my job was dealing with clients,
4 new contracts, etcetera, writing reports.
5 Part of my job was mentoring my staff.
6 Part of my job was managing contracts.
7 Part of my job was doing research on
8 some of those contracts that were mine and some that
9 were other people's.
10 Q. Did you have previous experience in
11 working with contracts and managing contracts, and
12 things of that nature?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. Where was that experience?
15 A. Oh, that started as a post-doctoral
16 student at Mississippi State, managing large grants
17 and contracts, and managing labs.
18 It continued as an assistant professor
19 at Southwestern Louisiana, again, managing grants,
20 which are just basically contracts that are fixed
21 fee for research, I guess.
22 Sometimes there's not much difference
23 between them.
24 Then managing, again, contracts at the
25 University of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
25
1 Q. What does BDA do?
2 If you had to describe-- where are they
3 located?
4 Let me start with that.
5 A. They are located in the Metropolitan
6 Orlando area.
7 Q. Approximately how big is this company?
8 How many employees?
9 A. Well, you can--
10 MR. HYDE: You mean formally or--
11 THE WITNESS: You're going to tell me
12 what time period you're talking about.
13 BY MR. BARTELL:
14 Q. Has that changed over a period of time?
15 A. It has.
16 Q. When you were working there, how many
17 people, approximately, worked there?
18 A. During the time frame?
19 Q. Yes. Just throw out maybe some dates and
20 examples.
21 A. When I started working in August, I
22 think there were about 64, is my recollection,
23 total, and that includes scientists and bookkeepers,
24 etcetera.
25 Some time in October or so, there were
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
26
1 about 103 or 104, and I think when I left in June,
2 there were about 42.
3 Q. I don't know anything about BDA, so the
4 questions may not make that much sense to you, but
5 I'm trying to get an idea of what BDA does.
6 Can you just try to explain to me what
7 type of company-- they are a company?
8 A. They are a privately held company,
9 privately held corporation.
10 Q. Could you try to describe generally, the
11 types of things they do there?
12 A. I would say the majority of what BDA
13 does, is help clients go through the permitting
14 process.
15 That involves everything from explaining
16 to them what the rules are, and-- to gathering
17 information that's required by agencies, insuring
18 that the engineering or whatever activities that go
19 on, are following the permit guidelines, sort of
20 overseeing projects, and then often, at the very
21 end, also monitoring, doing follow-ups for clients
22 to satisfy the permit requests.
23 I would say that is-- that is the
24 biggest part of what they do.
25 Q. The monitoring, you mean?
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
27
1 A. No, the whole facet of going through--
2 Q. Oh, everything you just mentioned?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Okay.
5 A. And within that context, there's a
6 component of map making.
7 They have a very sophisticated GIS
8 facility and global positioning system.
9 There are typically investigation of
10 endangered and threatened species, and typically,
11 investigations of wetlands and so forth, and I would
12 say that's the bulk of what they do.
13 Q. When you mentioned helping clients go
14 through the permitting process, what process are you
15 talking about?
16 A. Well, there are multiple permits that--
17 Q. Oh, you don't have any specifically--
18 like 404--
19 A. No, but 404 would be included.
20 I would say that the majority of the
21 permits involved landscape alteration development.
22 Q. So you went to work for them, and-- in
23 August of '92.
24 Did you start working on the Everglades
25 case at that time, or, I understand that we're
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
28
1 breaking this apart from the legal aspect, as
2 opposed to your research--
3 A. Pretty shortly after I arrived, I was
4 handed a task that involved the Everglades.
5 Q. What was that task?
6 A. That task was to look at the imbalance
7 issue.
8 Q. Could you explain to me what the
9 imbalance issue was?
10 A. That was part of my task to figure out
11 what it was, what it was intended to be, and how it
12 applied to the Everglades.
13 And I guess the other part of that was
14 to examine the documentation and the literature that
15 might or might not pertain to this particular issue.
16 Q. I understand that you're saying that
17 part of your task was to figure it out, but I'm
18 still not clear what-- they had to have an idea,
19 generally of what the imbalance issue was.
20 A. Certainly.
21 Q. Could you explain to me what that was,
22 or in their minds, what it was they were asking you
23 to figure out?
24 A. Well, I think the first task that I had
25 was to review all the information, the technical
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
29
1 information on the imbalance, which was--
2 Q. Before you continue, what imbalance?
3 A. Okay, on potential imbalance.
4 That involves changes in plant, animal
5 composition, in a portion of the Everglades,
6 particularly northern 2-A.
7 Q. So what did you specifically do?
8 A. Well, as I recall, my first task was
9 reviewing all the documents they had put together,
10 which I would characterize as background
11 information.
12 They had done a fairly extensive
13 literature search, and as I recall, had it broken up
14 into sections; fish, birds-- I can't remember all
15 that was in there-- and then they had a little
16 concluding portion, and I guess my first task was to
17 look at the literature and their conclusions from
18 the big picture, sort of backing up and thinking
19 about how wetlands work and how they don't work, and
20 verifying whether their conclusions seemed
21 reasonable, from the big picture of understanding
22 wetlands.
23 Q. What were their conclusions?
24 A. I don't recall. I just don't remember.
25 Q. Was your task to scientifically define
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
30
1 the meaning of imbalance of flora and fauna, from--
2 A. No.
3 Q. Can you tell me-- so you don't recall
4 what their conclusions were regarding the imbalance?
5 MR. HYDE: Just for clarity, when you say
6 their conclusion, who are you referring to?
7 BY MR. BARTELL:
8 Q. Okay. You just previously indicated
9 that you didn't recall what the conclusions were
10 that you were looking at.
11 What conclusions were you referring to?
12 A. They were conclusions regarding the
13 literature that was available on all of the
14 different faunal groups, as I recall.
15 I think it was only fauna-- wildlife,
16 fish, etcetera.
17 I don't think it dealt with plants at
18 all.
19 Q. So it was different conclusions and
20 different literature?
21 A. The document was broken up into
22 chapters.
23 Q. What document?
24 A. The document to which I'm referring, and
25 I don't remember what it was titled.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
31
1 It was Fish and Wildlife of the
2 Everglades. I just don't remember what that was.
3 Q. Everything we're talking about right
4 now, was contained within one document?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Was that document produced to us,
7 pursuant to this latest notice?
8 A. Not by me.
9 I did not have a copy.
10 I had presumed you had seen this before.
11 Q. Do you know who authored that document?
12 A. The document has multiple authors.
13 I think that Jay Exum may have been one
14 of the senior officers.
15 MR. HYDE: Jay Exum?
16 THE WITNESS: Jay Exum.
17 If he's not an author on there, he has
18 reviewed it very extensively, because he a
19 discussion about some facets of it.
20 As I recall, it dealt fairly strongly
21 with an area that he's very knowledgeable, and at
22 that time it-- it's the wildlife component.
23 BY MR. BARTELL:
24 Q. What kind of discussions did you have
25 with him regarding this document?
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
32
1 A. We had discussions regarding some of the
2 conclusions, particularly later in the year, when he
3 became involved in the case a little more heavily.
4 As I recall, he was not involved in this
5 in the early part, but got involved a little later
6 in terms of just wanting to review a lot of the
7 background material, and I don't recall whether
8 there was a rewrite of the document which he was
9 involved, or whether he was involved in the early
10 part-- I just don't remember that, but he and I had
11 a discussion later on, where we were talking about
12 their conclusions and whether they made sense, in
13 light of, again, the big picture of how wetlands
14 functioned relative to wildlife; the big picture of
15 about any of the new documents that had been
16 produced that I had seen, at least, or had been
17 discussed at the International Wetlands meeting in
18 Ohio, changed any of the conclusions of that
19 section.
20 I think I was looking to augment what
21 was there, and again, I don't know if that was
22 rewritten or not.
23 Q. I know you previously mentioned this,
24 what you thought was the title.
25 Could you tell me again what you think
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
33
1 the title again is of this particular document, what
2 you think it was?
3 A. If I told you, it would be so much of a
4 guess, you would probably be better off looking for
5 wildlife.
6 I seem to remember that wildlife was in
7 the title, but that's all I remember.
8 Q. What was your conclusion regarding this
9 document?
10 A. As I stated earlier, I don't remember
11 what the conclusions were of the individual
12 sections.
13 I do recall having some comment about
14 some of the conclusions, and my comments were
15 relative to the fact that it was-- that the
16 Everglades system was a wetland, and generic
17 understanding of how wetlands and wildlife work,
18 we-- would have probably given some perspective to
19 some of the conclusions.
20 Q. Did you write down your comments or
21 conclusions?
22 A. I'm positive that I wrote some comments
23 on the manuscript.
24 MR. HYDE: I would like to interject at
25 this point.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
34
1 Again, I don't know precisely what this
2 document is, but Doctor Hackney is not intended to
3 be an expert in faunal impact in the Everglades, and
4 secondarily, the document being referred to here,
5 may well be a product that was prepared in
6 preparation for litigation by BDA on behalf of my
7 law firm.
8 I don't know that for a fact, but based
9 on-- based on what we heard today, I'm not going to
10 foreclose your questioning, but I just wanted to
11 make that clear.
12 MR. BARTELL: I appreciate that.
13 BY MR. BARTELL:
14 Q. So to the best of your knowledge, you
15 made comment on this particular document.
16 Was there only one draft of the
17 document?
18 Do you know if there's a final draft?
19 That's two questions. Let me back up.
20 Was there more than one draft?
21 A. I would think there was.
22 I cannot recall seeing two drafts.
23 Q. All right.
24 A. I don't remember if there is a section
25 of the contract that we had with the attorneys that
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
35
1 was approved.
2 I think that was sort of the end work
3 product of that contract, and I don't remember if
4 that section of the contract, pursuing that avenue
5 of understanding in the case, was renewed. I just
6 don't remember.
7 If it was, I don't recall seeing a new
8 draft.
9 Q. So you've never seen a final draft,
10 then?
11 A. I don't recall seeing a draft after the
12 one that I reviewed, no.
13 Q. Okay. You mentioned that your tasks at
14 BDA were to figure out the imbalance issue and to
15 review the literature.
16 Is this the literature that you're
17 referring to, this one document?
18 A. This was some of the literature.
19 Q. What other types of literature did you
20 review?
21 A. The other types of literature dealt with
22 a segment of the controversy, that I think was
23 extremely vague for most people, may still be, and
24 that dealt with the microbial aspect, decomposition,
25 whether microbes are fauna, flora-- some real
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
36
1 philosophical things, on occasion.
2 Q. Can you explain to me what is the
3 microbial aspect, the decomposition aspect?
4 A. Well, as I recall, it dealt with some
5 studies that had been done-- I think one was by
6 Jones, and-- Jones, dealing with phosphatase
7 increases in sediment, might be described.
8 The second dealt with decomposition,
9 mostly in northern 2-A.
10 Q. Do you know who the author of that was?
11 A. I think there were actually several of
12 them.
13 I think there was actually more than one
14 paper there.
15 One of them was Davis.
16 Another one was Reeder and Davis.
17 I think there was also a document by
18 Nancy Urban, too, that dealt with-- actually, it
19 dealt with the macrofauna in litter bags, and-- I
20 interpreted that it had some relationship to the
21 microbial process.
22 I would say those are the-- were the
23 ones that were pretty important.
24 And I think that my task-- my charge was
25 to present to the attorneys the scientific logic and
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
37
1 argument that was being made, what actually is being
2 said, in simple terms; what are we arguing about,
3 really.
4 Q. You said you asked the attorneys.
5 We crossed the line from where you were
6 doing work for BDA, as opposed to when you were
7 working for the consultants, specifically, the
8 Peeples, Earl law firm?
9 A. No, because when I was at BDA, I
10 basically had two charges within-- at some point in
11 time.
12 One was fundamental research, and the
13 second was answering attorneys' queries as to what
14 does this mean, what does this paper say, in
15 layman's terms, questions of that nature.
16 MR. HYDE: Just for the record, I would
17 raise the objection as to work product, whether it
18 was actually communicated to the attorneys-- you can
19 certainly ask him what conclusion he developed
20 regarding these papers, so-- but I would like you to
21 limit your questions, so you don't ask what was
22 actually communicated to the attorneys, themselves.
23 BY MR. BARTELL:
24 Q. Did you reach conclusions regarding
25 these different documents that you reviewed, and
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
38
1 from my notes here, it seems that you have mentioned
2 one document by Jones regarding microbial aspects,
3 and multiple documents regarding decomposition in
4 water conversation area 2-A, and I think you listed
5 approximately three.
6 Again, back to my question-- regarding
7 these documents, did you reach conclusions?
8 A. Those documents are pretty multifaceted.
9 They-- I reached conclusions in a number
10 of different areas.
11 I think we need to be a little more
12 precise as to which area you would like me to
13 address.
14 Q. Let's go through them.
15 Starting with the Jones document--
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Can you tell me more about what that
18 document was, and if you know the full author's
19 name, what his name was--
20 A. I don't recall.
21 I'm sure I have got it in notes
22 somewhere.
23 As I recall, that work was done in the
24 lab, itself, and I recall asking to get access to
25 the site and was told that wasn't possible.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
39
1 I recall investigating the methodology,
2 and I recall recommending to the attorneys an
3 individual who knew a great deal about the methods,
4 itself, and interpreting their conclusions.
5 Q. Who was that individual?
6 A. Who did I recommend?
7 Q. Yes.
8 A. I think it was a professor at Penn State
9 or Pittsburgh--
10 MR. HYDE: I can provide you with the
11 name, if you want.
12 MR. BARTELL: I would appreciate it.
13 MR. HYDE: Doctor Dick Pratt, Penn State
14 University.
15 He's on our list of witnesses.
16 BY MR. BARTELL:
17 Q. Why did you want access to the park?
18 A. Well, I wanted to see the site where the
19 work was done.
20 Q. What was the work?
21 A. Basically, I looked at or concluded that
22 in areas where there were more nutrients, more
23 phosphorus, in particular, there was an increase in
24 activity of particular bacteria.
25 Q. What specific purposes did you want to
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
40
1 have access to the site for?
2 A. Well, initially, the access-- my
3 interest in the access was to look at some other
4 measures of microbial activity.
5 I was interested, particularly in
6 looking at fungal activity.
7 Q. Was this document produced to us, either
8 in your first production of documents, or either in
9 this latter production of documents?
10 MR. HYDE: I think it's the document that
11 you already have. It's-- that's what he's referring
12 to.
13 THE WITNESS: Yes. I think you have
14 that.
15 BY MR. BARTELL:
16 Q. Did you-- do you have an opinion as to
17 what Doctor Jones' conclusions are?
18 A. No.
19 Q. Do you feel it was a valid piece of
20 scientific research?
21 A. As I recall, my examination of what was
22 done and the methodology, led me to conclude that we
23 needed to talk to Doctor Pratt about the
24 methodology, because I thought the methodology was
25 critical to understanding whether the
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
41
1 interpretations were valid or not, so I passed that
2 task off to Doctor Pratt.
3 Q. So is it fair to say that you doubted
4 the conclusion Doctor Jones reached?
5 A. I'm a scientist. I doubt everything.
6 Q. Do you know if Doctor Pratt has gone and
7 done that work?
8 A. Well, I know that he was retained to
9 discuss the paper, itself, and the methods, but I
10 have not talked to Doctor Pratt about that.
11 MR. HYDE: Just for the purposes of the
12 record, Doctor Pratt has been deposed, and his
13 deposition transcript reflects his analysis.
14 MR. BARTELL: I understand that.
15 BY MR. BARTELL:
16 Q. Do you believe that nutrient levels
17 impact microbial activities?
18 A. Which nutrients?
19 Q. Do you believe that any nutrients affect
20 microbial activity?
21 MR. HYDE: I'm going to object to the
22 question, on vagueness.
23 It's a rather broad, subjective
24 question, that requires endless speculation as to
25 what activities might be affected by the nutrients.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
42
1 If you could be more specific, it might
2 help the witness answer the question.
3 BY MR. BARTELL:
4 Q. In your opinion, do you believe that
5 phosphorus levels may impact microbial activity?
6 A. I would say that any change in
7 environment affect microbial activity; seasonal
8 changes, water level changes, inputs or exports of
9 anything.
10 The view that these things are static,
11 is a fairly naive view.
12 Q. Would you say that an increase in
13 phosphorus availability, is a change to the
14 environment?
15 A. Can you state that again?
16 MR. BARTELL: Would you read that back,
17 please.
18 (Thereupon the referred to
19 question was read back by the
20 reporter as above recorded.)
21 THE WITNESS: It's a change, potential
22 change in nutrient availability.
23 BY MR. BARTELL:
24 Q. And could that, then, impact microbial
25 activity?
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
43
1 A. Everything can impact microbial
2 activity, in both directions.
3 Q. What do you mean in both directions?
4 A. It can increase activity and it can
5 decrease activity.
6 Q. Do you have an opinion as to whether
7 increases in phosphorus availability, would change
8 it in one direction or the other?
9 A. With respect to what?
10 Q. Well, increase in microbial activity or
11 decrease?
12 A. What kind of microbial activity?
13 I'm trying to get you to phrase this--
14 because there's a tremendous variation.
15 This is not a static system. Even when
16 nothing is happening, things are shifting back and
17 forth, as to who is doing what.
18 Q. Can you just describe to me, generally,
19 what is microbial activity?
20 A. Okay. It's metabolism by bacteria and
21 fungi, as the literature usually uses it.
22 I would refer to it more as a scientist,
23 just to bacteria, but the literature includes
24 microbes, bacteria and fungi.
25 Q. And what are these things? What do these
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
44
1 things do?
2 I'm not a scientist, and I'm trying to
3 have a little--
4 A. How many days do we have here?
5 MR. NETTLETON: Plenty.
6 BY MR. BARTELL:
7 Q. If you could summarize--
8 A. Let me just categorize it. I'll put it
9 in several categories, and let you sort of decide
10 which you want.
11 Q. These are categories of different-- what
12 do these categories represent? What do they--
13 A. Different types of activities.
14 Bacteria and fungi have metabolisms, at
15 least some of the microbes, that are extremely
16 different than most of the organisms that we deal
17 with.
18 They use as energy sources and carbon
19 sources, items that are extremely different than
20 what plants and animals typically use, so we have
21 organisms that are aerobic in nature, needing and
22 requiring oxygen, and we have those that are
23 anaerobic, that do not require oxygen.
24 We have ones that can do both. We have
25 microbes that literally get their energy from toxic
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
45
1 compounds, and in some cases, some of these microbes
2 are the bases of food chains, and in other cases,
3 they are extremely important in nutrient cycling.
4 In some cases, they are important in
5 creating toxic metabolites to soils and waters.
6 It is probably from a biochemical
7 standpoint, a greater diversity than all of the rest
8 of the organisms on the earth.
9 Q. Are there examples of all of these
10 different types of categories, of microbes in the
11 Everglades?
12 A. I'm sure.
13 Q. Does an increase in phosphorus
14 availability, impact or change microbial activity,
15 specifically the production of alkaline phosphatase?
16 A. Probably.
17 Q. Can you describe how that may be
18 accomplished?
19 A. I would defer that question to Doctor
20 Pratt.
21 I'm not a microbiologist.
22 Q. You mentioned before you felt you were
23 an expert in wetlands.
24 A. That's right.
25 Q. Do you categorize yourself as an expert
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
46
1 in any other areas?
2 A. Yes. I'm an expert in estuarine
3 ecology.
4 Q. Other than estuarine, or can we say
5 coastal ecology--
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Other than that, and wetlands, do you
8 consider yourself an expert in any other areas?
9 A. No, and you should understand within
10 that expertise, there are various subdivisions of
11 each of those, that are extremely different.
12 Q. Could we maybe go through some of
13 those-- well, going into these two categories that
14 you described, yourself, and I understand the broad
15 categories, coastal ecology and wetland.
16 Could we get into these two different
17 categories, and-- let's say the subcategories, or
18 the specific areas?
19 A. Okay.
20 Q. And before I ask you to do that, would
21 that be easier to do by looking through your CV?
22 A. That would probably take us into most of
23 the major areas.
24 Q. It would? Okay.
25 I'm going to come back to that.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
47
1 You mentioned that you reviewed this
2 Jones document, as well as approximately three
3 others.
4 This is going back to your work at BDA.
5 A. Let me also say I probably reviewed most
6 of the documents in this case.
7 You, as I recall-- you asked me which
8 ones I was using at part of that imbalance issue in
9 the very beginning of my work.
10 At least that was the answer that I
11 provided.
12 Q. You're talking about in response to my
13 notice?
14 A. No. I was talking about response to my
15 early work at BDA.
16 Q. Okay. Can you-- would you estimate how
17 many documents you looked at in this case?
18 MR. HYDE: Answer to the best of your
19 ability.
20 THE WITNESS: Well, I can-- let me start
21 out doing it this way. This is an easy way to do
22 it.
23 I reviewed all the documents that Nancy
24 Urban provided from her deposition; all the ones
25 that Irv Mendelson provided; all the ones that Steve
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
48
1 Davis provided through his deposition; all the ones
2 that Lou Toth provided with his deposition.
3 I reviewed-- I'm looking for another
4 category that would lump a lot of these together.
5 I reviewed all documents that pertain to
6 the section at the International Wetlands
7 Conference, you know, in Ohio in the fall of '92.
8 I think most of those were abstracts,
9 but some of them were based on previous work that I
10 was able to look at.
11 I reviewed most of the documents
12 contained in the wildlife report that I mentioned
13 earlier.
14 When I say review, I looked at them,
15 read them, sometimes commented as to whether there
16 were part of them that were really well done, parts
17 that weren't well done, and other avenues of
18 research that could be followed.
19 Q. Where did you get all these documents to
20 enable you to review them?
21 A. BDA library.
22 There was a library of documents in this
23 case, and I think on only one occasion did I find
24 that the document that we did not have, that I
25 wanted, and that was supplied by South Florida Water
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
49
1 Management District after that.
2 I would have no idea what the number
3 was.
4 Many of the documents consisted of
5 multiple revisions of papers.
6 There wasn't many.
7 Q. So BDA has an extensive library in
8 Orlando?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. You mentioned you were asked to figure
11 out the imbalance issue as one of your tasks at BDA.
12 Did you ever figure out that imbalance
13 issue?
14 A. Did I ever answer the attorneys'
15 questions as to what it actually is?
16 Q. Yes.
17 A. I doubt it did to their satisfaction.
18 I commented on the biological aspects of
19 what it meant or didn't mean, and the validity of
20 what was described to me, as-- the legal side, in
21 the biological world.
22 Q. Can you describe that-- could you
23 summarize that into a conclusion that you reached?
24 A. My conclusion was that the law was based
25 on the Everglades being a fairly static system, and
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
50
1 that in the real world, there's very little static
2 to most wetlands, or particularly, wetlands that go
3 through cycles of disturbance and-- natural
4 disturbance.
5 Q. What law are we talking about?
6 A. With respect to the biological or--
7 Q. You previously just mentioned that--
8 A. The imbalance-- the description-- the
9 legal description of what the imbalance was.
10 Q. Do you recall what that legal
11 description is?
12 A. Not verbatim, sure.
13 Q. Can you tell me generally what that
14 legal description was?
15 A. Generally, it's a shift in the
16 composition of plant and animals, caused by, in this
17 case, phosphorus, I presume.
18 Q. Based on all of these reviews, these
19 numerous reviews that you have done, is it your
20 opinion that phosphorus entering the water in water
21 conservation areas, results in any changes in the
22 ecosystem of the water conservation areas?
23 A. Is it resulting in any changes--
24 Q. Yes.
25 A. What kind of changes?
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
51
1 It results in phosphorus being in there.
2 That's a change.
3 Q. Can you think of any other examples of
4 changes that it may result in?
5 A. Do you want me to speculate as to all
6 the list of things that could have happened?
7 Is that what you're asking here?
8 Q. Not speculate, but I want to know if you
9 have any opinion as to whether this phosphorus
10 entering the water conservation areas, causes
11 changes, other than the fact that there's a
12 increased phosphorus in the water conservation
13 areas.
14 A. Well, it certainly raises the
15 conductivity in the water.
16 Phosphorus is a nutrient.
17 I think that there is reasonably good
18 data to support that plants respond to increased
19 nutrients, in improved production.
20 I think that areas that have higher
21 phosphorus available to them, have increased
22 production, primarily productivity.
23 Q. Is that what you mean by plant response
24 to increased nutrients, or is that a separate--
25 A. No. I guess that's--
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
52
1 Could you read that back?
2 THE WITNESS: Well, phosphorus would be
3 expected to increase productivity of plants, if it
4 is, in fact, available to the plants.
5 BY MR. BARTELL:
6 Q. What does it mean to say increased
7 productivity?
8 A. It means that the annual productivity of
9 biomass, the accumulation of complex carbon
10 molecules by plants, leaves, stems, roots, etcetera,
11 would be higher.
12 Q. You said improved production.
13 Can you tell me what you mean by
14 improved?
15 A. Increased.
16 Q. So is it-- would you-- in your opinion,
17 is any increased production and in biomass and
18 plants, the same as improved?
19 A. I was using it in that fashion,
20 improved, increased.
21 There's more biomass than there was
22 previously.
23 Q. Would you say that the amount of
24 phosphorus entering the water conservation areas, is
25 considered a normal change to this static system?
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
53
1 A. I would say that the amount of
2 phosphorus entering the system, probably isn't the
3 critical component.
4 It's the amount of phosphorus available
5 to the plant that would be critical.
6 Q. Is there increased phosphorus available
7 to the plant?
8 A. I would presume there would be.
9 Q. Do you consider that to be normal in
10 this system?
11 A. There are parts of the Everglades and
12 times in the Everglades, where that has probably
13 been normal.
14 Q. Would you consider that to be normal at
15 this time, in the water conservation areas?
16 MR. HYDE: I'm going to object to the
17 form of the question, because it asks the witness to
18 speculate as to what it normal at this time, and you
19 don't have a reference point yet.
20 BY MR. BARTELL:
21 Q. Do you have an opinion as to what is a
22 normal increase or normal amount of phosphorus, that
23 would be entering the Everglades?
24 A. I think if you look at the concentration
25 of phosphorus in soils after fires, you probably can
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
54
1 use that as a measure of the maximum phosphorus
2 that's probably normal for the Everglades.
3 Q. Do you have an opinion as to, like,
4 reference, in numbers, as to what that would be?
5 A. I would have to pull out documents and
6 look at that.
7 It could be done.
8 I haven't spent a lot of time looking at
9 that.
10 Q. Do you feel that there are different
11 plants or-- well, let me rephrase that.
12 In your opinion, do different plants
13 respond differently to the increase in phosphorus?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. And in your opinion, how does sawgrass
16 respond to an increase in phosphorus?
17 A. From the data that I have seen, and from
18 my own observations, it responds by growing more.
19 The timespan that it seems to take, is--
20 seems to be in question.
21 But it clearly grows greater with
22 greater nutrients.
23 Q. How would you say that cattails respond
24 to increases in phosphorus?
25 A. It clearly responds to phosphorus
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
55
1 increases, as well.
2 Q. Would you say that one cattail-- would
3 you say that cattails and/or sawgrass, respond
4 greater than the other?
5 A. I would say that cattail responds more
6 quickly than sawgrass.
7 I-- now that we're talking about cattail
8 and sawgrass, I would ask you, if I-- it sounds like
9 I said them backwards. Please tell me if I did,
10 because I do that often.
11 I just say the names backward. I know
12 which is which.
13 MR. HYDE: I'll keep that in mind.
14 MR. BARTELL: You're going to take care
15 of that, Mr. Hyde?
16 MR. HYDE: Just ask many questions.
17 BY MR. BARTELL:
18 Q. Do you feel that cattails can survive in
19 areas that don't have increased phosphorus in the
20 Everglades?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. Are cattails native to the Everglades?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Do you feel that the percentage of or
25 the areal extent of--
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
56
1 A. Can I stop and go to the last question?
2 Q. Sure.
3 A. Let me ask you to tell me which species
4 of cattails.
5 Q. My understanding is that there are two
6 species of cattails in the Everglades.
7 Is that incorrect?
8 A. It may be.
9 Q. How many species of-- how many species
10 of cattails are in the Everglades?
11 A. Well, there are two clearly documented
12 species.
13 There may be some other forms that are
14 there, as well.
15 Q. In your opinion, is there a hybrid or
16 another form of cattail in the Everglades?
17 A. I think there's reason to think that
18 there is.
19 Q. Have you done any research to determine
20 whether there is a third or other types of cattail--
21 A. I have not done any research on that
22 subject.
23 Q. Are you aware of any research that's
24 currently ongoing, to determine if there is a hybrid
25 or other type of hybrid in the Everglades?
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
57
1 A. No.
2 Q. Can you tell me what reason you have to
3 believe that there may be a hybrid form of cattail?
4 A. A number of reasons.
5 The first being that hybridization in
6 areas that are highly perturbed, particularly with
7 plants that are wind pollinated, is common, and I
8 would site for you examples of Spartina
9 alteniflura.
10 There's apparently a new type of
11 Spartina alteniflura on the West Coast, and numerous
12 others, so from that standpoint, it's the ideal
13 scenario for the ideal situation.
14 I have looked at, keyed out this
15 particular form, taken it back, and looked fairly
16 carefully at it, to see if I could find any
17 morphological variations, and did not find any that
18 were consistent with a new species, but that's not
19 uncommon for varieties, and so forth.
20 The other thing that is interesting is
21 the way that the plants seem to be standing in
22 multiple areas of the Everglades; again,
23 characteristics of new forms.
24 New forms often invade areas that are
25 disturbed or outside of the normal range for the
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
58
1 species.
2 I also know that the type of domingensis
3 that I had seen before along the Atlantic Coast,
4 North Carolina, Virginia, and even part of Florida,
5 had different flowering characteristics, and
6 typically cattails that are high in nutrients,
7 flower profusely, and even in areas that are alleged
8 to be high nutrient, cattails didn't-- when I say
9 cattails, I'm talking about domingensis-- it didn't
10 flower, except back in the areas, what I would call
11 the reference sites.
12 Back in Loxahatchee, there were areas
13 where it was flowering, very similar to what I had
14 seen in other parts of the range.
15 I can recall one or two other places
16 around the Everglades, that looked normal.
17 There are other reasons they-- at that
18 time, again, reason to speculate or look at, some
19 sort of high rate in shift of genom.
20 Q. What is the affect on cattails, when
21 they flower more than normal?
22 For instance, does that mean that more
23 cattails are going to grow, because there's more
24 flowers?
25 A. It does not mean that you have-- having
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
59
1 more flowering, doesn't mean anything, unless you
2 get higher seed production, and even higher seed
3 production, doesn't necessarily mean you will have
4 more seedlings, but simply means there is more
5 potential.
6 Q. And you found that to exist in areas
7 where there is high nutrients?
8 A. What I noted, there were fewer cattails
9 flowering than I would anticipate.
10 I think what I said, increased nutrients
11 typically, if they are getting all the other
12 micronutrients, causes increased flowering of
13 plants, including cattails.
14 Q. When you say increased nutrients, you
15 mean as opposed to a system that doesn't have
16 increased nutrients?
17 A. Under normal scenarios, there's a level
18 of nutrients that plants are used to having, and
19 that balance frequently shifts back and forth during
20 times which the plants are able to sequester more
21 nutrients, or there's some other disturbance,
22 frequently flowers more heavily.
23 A fire, for instance-- you have seen
24 that the next year, presumably due to increased
25 nutrients, as well as other things.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
60
1 As I said, in areas where there's higher
2 phosphorus in the soil and higher phosphorus in the
3 water, I anticipate seeing a lot more cattail
4 flowering.
5 Q. But you say you expected to see more
6 increased flowering.
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. But did you still see increased
9 flowering with-- associated with increased
10 nutrients?
11 A. I never did any studies to look at
12 that.
13 I was simply comparing that to
14 domingensis stands that I have seen before.
15 Q. Do you consider the phosphorus enriched
16 part of the Everglades, to be highly disturbed?
17 A. Say that again?
18 Q. Do you consider-- well, do you consider
19 part of the Everglades to be phosphorus enriched,
20 let's say, beyond what's normal?
21 MR. HYDE: Object to the form of the
22 question.
23 THE WITNESS: I consider parts of the
24 Everglades to be highly disturbed.
25 BY MR. BARTELL:
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
61
1 Q. Within that term, would you say that
2 includes increases in phosphorus?
3 A. Increases in phosphorus, above
4 background, and when I say background, I'm including
5 the condition that would exist after fire, for
6 instance, in which you get a concentration of
7 phosphorus.
8 Q. So the condition after a fire-- are
9 fires normal in the Everglades?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. So after a fire, if you have increased
12 nutrients or increased phosphorus, would that be
13 considered normal?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. How do you know there would be increased
16 phosphorus after a fire?
17 A. How do I know there would be?
18 Q. Yes.
19 A. Some samples that were taken-- I think
20 they were from the Holy Land, maybe northern 2-A,
21 that were in areas that were burned, heavy peat.
22 Q. Would there be a difference in the
23 amount of phosphorus in the system, after peat
24 fires, as opposed to just surface fires?
25 A. Yes.
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
62
1 Q. Which would have more?
2 A. The peat fires would leave more.
3 Q. Would leave more phosphorus?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Other than fire, can you think of other
6 examples, or do you know of other examples that may
7 increase phosphorus to the Everglades?
8 A. Well, bird rookeries are certainly one
9 of them.
10 Q. I'm sorry?
11 A. Rookeries, heavy concentration of
12 nesting birds, frequently do that.
13 Q. Okay. Just to clarify, then, these
14 different areas with increased phosphorus, is that
15 considered disturbance?
16 A. Which areas?
17 Q. For instance, after a fire--
18 A. Okay.
19 Q. Would that be considered disturbance?
20 MR. HYDE: Is the fire the disturbance,
21 or the increased phosphorus, after the fire, the
22 disturbance, or together?
23 MR. BARTELL: Could you answer that
24 question?
25 THE WITNESS: Well, I think that what you
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
63
1 have to consider is that the Everglades is a wetland
2 characterized by periods of stability, and then
3 periods of disturbance, and the periodicity probably
4 varies a lot.
5 Most wetlands have periods that-- I
6 would say fire would naturally be a disturbance, or
7 could be.
8 BY MR. BARTELL:
9 Q. You also mentioned rookeries could be a
10 disturbance?
11 A. Well, on a spacial scale, it probably
12 changes the norm, the average in terms of what is
13 available in nutrients.
14 It probably leads to increased predation
15 pressure, so forth.
16 MR. HYDE: I think you're using the term
17 disturbance here, rather loosely.
18 Go ahead and put the question any way
19 you want.
20 MR. BARTELL: Let's take a short break
21 right now.
22 MR. HYDE: Good.
23 (Thereupon a recess was taken
24 in the deposition, after which
25 the deposition continued as follows:)
JACK BESONER & ASSOCIATES
150 WEST FLAGLER STEET, MIAMI, FL 33130 (305) 371-1537
64
1 BY MR. BARTELL:
2 Q. Doctor Hackney, you previously indicated
3 that increased levels in phosphorus beyond
4 background levels, equals disturbance.
5 What are the background levels?
6 A. The background levels that I was
7 referring to, would be the maximum phosphorus that
8 would be available in the soil after a deep peat
9 fire, and I don't know what that value is.
10 You need to probably do inspection and
11 experiments to verify or look at some deep natural
12 fires, to see.
13 Q. And that is the extent of what you mean
14 by background levels, is after a deep pe