index_photo001.jpg (19992 bytes)

Everglades Classroom

University of Miami

    FSS199     Fall 2000
                    
         
                                    
Agenda
                            
 
       Documents
                          
Paper Topics
                          
Student Papers

                       Fall 1999
  
  Other Links

    
Return to top of page

FSS199 -   A Freshman Seminar on the Everglades Economic
                    Problems
                
  
School of International Studies


rtri.gif (181 bytes)     Fall 2000


01-Nov--00
Missing Pieces in Ecosystem Restoration: The Case of the Florida Everglades   new.gif (1016 bytes)
Economic Systems Research, VoL 12, No. 3, 2000
RICHARD WEISSKOFF
(Received January 1999; revised November 1999)

ABSTRACT The largest ecosystem restoration in the world-a $7.8 billion rescue package-is now beginning in the Florida Everglades. This paper examines both the economic impact of the restoration itself and those pieces that are 'missing' from the official project analysis; namely, increased tourism, urban construction, in-migration, and changing agricultural patterns. These pieces comprise a variety of scenarios that are tested for a 45 year planning period with an augmented input-output model derived from a regional SAM. The new output and employment generated by the 'missing pieces', which are small relative to the vast economic base of the region, do represent a considerable increase over the annual growth, especially by the year 2045. We conclude with a discussion of ways in which a growing regional economy might be reconciled with ecosystem restoration.


Everglades Litigation Workshop, UM Law Library
10/26/2000  

  
Agenda

Everglades Litigation Workshop, UM Law Library
10/26/2000, Agenda


   Agenda documents

Introduction

PowerPoint presentation  

Chronology 

Litigation timeline  

Central and Southern Florida Project

House Document 643
Establishment of CSFP Project

Environmental Problems Arise

Ron Jones' Declaration   
Scientist's testimony re nutrient cycling 

Federal lawsuit

Federal case   
USDC 88-1886


United States complaint
The plaintiff's first pleading

U.S. motion for summary judgment
The government's summary of the case

SWIM Plan
The state's environmental plan for the everglades

Marjory Stoneman Douglas Act
The state's legal basis for its environmental plan

Settlement Agreement
Settlement between federal and state parties

Form of the Settlement Agreement
Outline of the major provisions and issues in the Settlement 

Consent Decree
Judge's approval of settlement agreement with proviso that affected parties may challenge administrative remedy implementation

SWIM Challenge

SWIM Challenge cases
Cooperative v. SFWMD, DOAH 92-3038

Petitioner's challenge
Affected parties challenge of administrative remedy

Statement of Principles
Agreement between and federal and state parties

Everglades Forever Act
Legal codification of settlement in SWIM challenge


 
   Paper Topics


1.  Ecosystem
        
 
         Discuss the characteristics of the natural
         un-impacted everglades ecosystem and how it
         is different from the degraded ecosystem.

         Your analysis should answer these questions:
         a)  What nutrient levels, habitat and vegetation
              patterns, and water flow characterize the
              natural and impacted ecosystems?
         b)  What does the federal government believe
              causes nutrient loading in the everglades?
         c)  Do you believe other causes are possible?
         d)  What is the difference between a narrative
              standard and a numeric one?
         e)  What is the limiting factor in everglades
              ecosystem?

   
2.  Federal Case
        
       
Discuss the government's arguments in U.S v. 
        SFWMD
, USDC # 88-1886-CIV-Hoeveler as
        outlined in its complaint.
 
        Your analysis should answer these questions:
         a)  What is the main issue(s) outlined in the
              plaintiff's complaint?
         b)  Why was the federal government the
              plaintiff?  Why wasn't the State of Florida,
              or a concerned citizen, the moving
              plaintiff?
         c)  Why did the plaintiff sue state agencies?
         d)  Use the U.S. complaint and the SA outline, to
              illustrate your exposition.

3.  Legal Structure
        
        
Discuss the legal framework within which the
         federal and administrative actions where
         played out.  Talk about the jurisdictions, parties,
         moving papers (pleadings) and the rules for them
         within the legal system.

         Your analysis should answer these questions:
         a)  Who are the parties in a lawsuit, what moving
              papers are typically filed initially?
         b)  What is the difference between civil and
              criminal cases?  
         c)  What are statutes and case law? What is stare
              decisis? 
         d)  What are orders?
         e)  Can you appeal to a higher court?  Outline
              some of the appellate levels within the legal
              system.
          f)  Give an example of a statute, case law, used
              in a pleading.
         g)  Use the U.S. complaint, Coop petition, the SA
              outline, to illustrate your exposition.


4.   The Other Side
         
      
   Argue the other side of the coin.  Submit an
         answer in response to the U.S. complaint, or
         review the issues raised by the Cooperative in its
         petition.  Not all issues are set in stone.  There is
         a lot that is still in controversy. Defend the
         agricultural interests or the state agencies.   

         Your analysis should answer these questions:
         a)  Is the federal government without blame
              on the issue?   
         b)  Focus on one issue
         c)  Discuss what you feel may be a weakness in
              the federal government's arguments on that
              issue.
         c)  What is your, or the defendant Ag, or agency
              position?  Defend it.
         d)  What would be fair resolution?


5.  Independent Research
         
         Using the Everglades Litigation web site,
         www.law.miami.edu/everglades, research some
         issue that interests you. Introduce your issue,
         related to the everglades, or some aspect of
         environmental science or policy in general. 
         Discuss how you attempted to use the tools on the
         site. 

          Analyze two documents that your research found,
          whether the document is located on the site, is
          part of an outside link, or was found through a
          chain of links, is irrelevant.     

         Your research must be specific, for e.g., 
         a)  How does mercury impact the everglades
              ecosystem?, or
         b)  Where does the mercury found in the
              everglades come from?, or
         c)  Who are the experts in mercury?  What do they
              think?

        Any one of those items is sufficient for this
        assignment.  Substitute any issue or problem as
        long as it is not so general that it would be difficult
        to obtain a specific range of documents or answers.
        If you read some of the hand outs, or visit the web
        site, you should discover something that interests
        you.  Convert it into a question and that should help
        you formulate a research item.

       Your analysis should answer these questions:
         
         a)  What is your issue?  
         b)  How did you formulate your query, your
              research?
         c)  What were your results?  Did you get an
              answer?  What is it?
         d)  Was it difficult to get the right document?
         e)  Did you encounter problems?
         f)   Did you find new topics or sites along the way?
         g)  How would you improve the everglades web
              site, or any other web site encountered in your
              research?  Be kind!

   Student Papers

Ariola:   Florida's Dirty Dozen

Fernandez:  'Glades and the Legal System  

Lescan:   Declaration of Ronald Jones

Mills:  Miccosukees Fight for The Everglades


Noble:  STA - Stormwater Treatment Areas

 

   Other

 

 

rtri.gif (181 bytes)        Fall 1999


     Field trip photos     

0       1        2        3      

4       5        6    
    7       

8
  
     9       10       11      

12
      13     14       15

16      17
     18       19

20      21     22      23

                           

 

Return to top of page

       

 

 

Return to top of page

        

 

Return to top of page

        Other Links

        The Everglades Economics Program

 

 

 

Everglades Collection

University of Miami School of Law Library

Archives & Special Collections
Everglades Collection Curator
1311 Miller Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
(305) 284-4093

03/25/03